Choosing Between Activators & Repressors

We now have two ways of regulating gene expression, and they seem to be able to do the same things. Which should we use?

An diagram of a gene with an activator and a gene with a repressor, side-by-side. Credit: CalTech

Michael Savageau researched this in the context of bacterial metabolic genes and digestive enzyme production in 1977.1 He found that genes in high demand were usually regulated by activators, while those in low demand were generally regulated by repressors.

Low demand vs. high demand Credit: CalTech

He hypothesized the “use it or lose it” rule: essentially, the somewhat counterintuitive behavior was due to selection pressure that would eliminate the regulators if they were not used enough.

There have been other explanations, too:

At this point, we’re pretty sure that, in the majority of cases, regulators are used for lower-demand proteins, and activators are used for higher-demand proteins, as Savageau suggested. As shown by the varying ideas above, though, we still don’t know why.

You’ve reached the end, for now. I hope to expand this site in the future. If you have any questions, comments, or suggestions, please feel free to tell me about them.

  1. Savageau, M. A. (1977). Design of molecular control mechanisms and the demand for gene expression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 74(12), 5647–5651. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.74.12.5647 

  2. Shinar, G., Dekel, E., Tlusty, T., & Alon, U. (2006). Rules for biological regulation based on error minimization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(11), 3999–4004. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506610103 

  3. Gerland, U., & Hwa, T. (2009). Evolutionary selection between alternative modes of gene regulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(22), 8841–8846. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808500106